Further developing the idea of overmedicalization of the human
condition, see Nortin M. Hadler, The
Last Well Person (McGill-Queen's
Univ. Press, 2004).
On the technological imperative in medicine, see R.A. Deyo &
D.L. Patrict, Hope or Hype: The OBsession with Medical Advances and the
High Cost of False Promises (2005).
Here is another view of what ``health'' and ``illness'' might mean:
[H]appiness meets all reasonable criteria for a psychiatric disorder. It is statistically abnormal and consists of a discrete cluster of symptoms. . . . [H]appiness is usually characterized by a positive mood, sometimes described as ``elation'' or ``joy,'' although this may be relatively absent in the milder happy states, sometimes termed ``contentment.'' The behavioral components of happiness . . . suggest that happy people are often carefree, impulsive, and unpredictable in their actions, . . . including a high frequency of recreational interpersonal contacts and prosocial actions toward others identified as less happy. . . . There is excellent experimental evidence that happy people are irrational. . . . Happy people have been shown to exhibit various biases of judgment that prevent them from acquiring a realistic understanding of their physical and social environment. . . . Acceptance of these arguments leads to the obvious conclusion that happiness should be included in future taxonomies of mental illness. . . . I humbly suggest that the term ``happiness'' be replaced by the more formal description major affective disorder, pleasant type, in the interests of scientific precision and in the hope of reducing any possible diagnostic ambiguities.Richard P. Bentall, A Proposal to Classify Happiness as a Psychiatric Disorder, 18 J. Med. Ethics 94 (June 1992).
For a thoughtful analysis of why people make widely different
about investing in their own health, and what can be done about this,
Barak Richman, Behavioral Economics and Health Policy: Understanding
Failure, 90 Cornell L. Rev. Law Rev. ___ (2005). He concludes
"offering medical care alone is unlikely to benefit a Medicaid
that suffers from multiple sources of poor health. . . .
the delivery of medical care with services that appreciate the
context of poor health could significantly improve health outcomes
requiring expensive care."
Return to home page.